Insurers' fight against fraud was boosted early in April by a Court ruling that an exaggerated personal injury claim was in contempt of Court.

In Kirk vs Walton, the claimant asked for over £750,000 for injuries allegedly sustained in a road traffic accident in 2001 when her car was hit at the rear. During the court hearing Direct Line, the defendant's insurer, disclosed video evidence of the claimant walking, shopping and driving and as soon as this was disclosed the claim was withdrawn.

The defendant then brought contempt of Court proceedings with the backing of her insurer. The proceedings were successful and the erstwhile claimant ordered to pay costs. As the legal expenses cover had been withdrawn, this left Ms Kirk with a bill of over £125,000.